Wednesday, April 14, 2021

Two Factor Screwing by Github

A few years back I attempted to create a free Github account, which I needed for work.  Everyone was supposed to have a Github account to access the mind bending array of Java packages used in our corporate database.

By mistake, somehow, I ended up not creating a free account but a paid account for which I was billed $4 a month.  I said to myself, OK, well someday I might use that myself.  It angered me that Github started billing me $4 a month for something I had thought was going to be free.  But it wasn't a big deal compared with other issues I faced then, and I thought it might one day be useful.

Of course, I should have known that I could not use an account associated with my work email once my work email was expunged.  But that possibility, of losing my job and work email, hadn't occurred to me then, 3 years ago.  

I had been at the same organization for 23 years.  23 years ago, not everyone had a personal email account or internet provider.  I pretty much used my work email address for everything.  Every personal email address I created elsewhere was quickly overrun with spam.  Since I had to read my work email anyway, I figured I'd just handle all the spam there and ignore all my other email accounts  We had a policy that we could use our company email and internet access for personal purposes so long as it did not affect business.  The main concern was people bogging down the computer systems.  So far as I know, that never happened.  That was the way it was for a long time, as impossibly utopian as it sounds now.  By the time I created my Github account, that policy was perhaps not so much in force, but it had never been officially rescinded either, at least to my knowledge.

I'm not sure we actually used Github much.  We used other similar services more.

At some point, not much later, the company decided to crack down on "Personal Dropbox" accounts, where people were using their company email for essentially personal accounts on Dropbox.  Or using personal emails for a company oriented account.  A very big deal was made about such accounts.  I converted my Dropbox account (which was and still is free) which had been created using my work email address to a personal one using my personal email during a window of opportunity provided for that purpose.

The company never mentioned personal Github accounts, and so I did nothing about mine.  I had never put anything there, but was still being billed, and I figured someday I would use it for myself.

Now, I still remember my Github password.  But since Github is demanding Authentication, I cannot log in because it sends to authentication code to my now non-existent work email address.

This also means, or so it seems, that since I can't login, I have no way to delete the account.

I called the Github phone number listed by my credit card.  It gives me 3 choices:

1) For HR or Employment Verification

2) For Github Account Support

3) Sales

Option #2 simply gives you a recorded message, information which is useless to me because I can't login to the account.  Of course I can do nothing because I can't log into my account because it demands that I enter the code sent to my non-existent work email address.

I previously tried sending two messages to Github asking they change the email associated  with my account. 

They sent no response whatever.

 Of course I see now they cannot do that.  I could, in theory, be trying to use my work account to access some information at my previous employer that I am not authorized to access.  The only thing I can do now is "delete" the account at which point it becomes owned by Ghost.

I still hoped that they might email me with a form message saying "they can't change account details."  It might tell me that I can only delete the account, and give details on how I might do that.  But no such friendly email ever arrived.

Now I left two messages at the Sales option on the voice menu for their phone number.  I'm not optimistic I'll ever get a response.

I really detest when services like Github actually provide no "service."  There's no way to get them to do anything without using online features after logging in.  That's probably going to be the case this time.

But to satisfy my credit card company, I'll have wait another day to see if Github responds to the messages I left on their phone with the Sales option.  They send me a warning whenever I try to use the Dispute process without trying to Contact The Merchant first.

Update: Github responded to my request to stop billing me in the same day.  They said my credit card has been removed and I will no longer be billed.  Apparently the secret is that you have to demand billing be stopped.  If you can find the right portal to send them a message without logging in.  I had also sent the last 4 digits of my credit card number and my now-inaccessible old email address.





Friday, April 9, 2021

IRS

I now need to create an account at IRS.gov.  Wish me luck.  The first time through, I entered all the information, correctly.  But then when I got to the point where I enter my cellphone, it refused to accept!

I could give my landline, except it specifically says it won't accept landlines.

None of my information has changed in a long time, maybe 10 years.

WHY OH WHY did it not accept my cellphone number, which hasn't changed in 10 years???

Possibly because my cellphone number is not the PRIMARY number for the financial institution I selected.

However the IRS site itself doesn't give that guidance.

I tried to go back to the beginning and enter a different credit card number.  However, this time it decided to lock me out for 24 hours.  It further tells me I may not be able to resolve this issue at the call center.

*** Second Attempt

Immediately after the first failure, ,I checked out the phone numbers at all my credit card accounts.  Discover already had my correct number listed as Mobile Number.  Since IRS demands a Mobile Number, I hoped that would be sufficient.  On other credit cards I either changed my cell number as Primary Number, or simply deleted the landline number.  So this time, I would not fail, I hoped.

I started using Discover which has long had my correct mobile number listed as Mobile Number.

Once again, it failed, saying it could not verify my phone number.  It gave me no ability to try a different credit card, if that was even the issue.

But this time, it also directed me to request activation by mail in 5-10 days, so I chose that option.  Meanwhile I created a login, or so it seems.

I'm very glad now they gave us an extra month to complete the tax filing.  I hope that will be sufficient to create an account to get the information I need regarding my stimulus payments.




Wednesday, January 27, 2021

Hackers running my smart home ?

The only noticeable way hackers have been running my smart home, is that endless Java updates often cause my system to break and I have to synchronize my software with my Java release, and also on each Java update I must run through hoops to get Mac to even allow my Java-based system to run.

Thursday, December 24, 2020

How many websites does SilverScript need?

My medigap insurance agent was supposed to have set up my monthly billing for SilverScript PDP, "part" of Aetna.  Or at least that's what I thought, for my coverage which is beginning on January 1.  I had it all arranged in October for peace of mind.

Come December 22, I receive a paper bill for my SilverScript, due January 1.  I emailed my agent and he said I had better set up automatic payments myself "just to be sure."

I planned to take care of this on December 23, but after setting up Christmas Lights I decided not to hassle with it.  Should only take a few minutes on the morning of December 24, I thought.

I didn't get around to looking at it until after dinnter on December 24.  The paper bill instructed me to visit the AetnaMedicare.com website.  Sadly I didn't read the bill more carefully than that.  I just figured I'd set up an account at Aetna/SliverScript, and I could set up bill payments.

So I first tried to register an account.   Without any explanation, Aetna automatically directed me to Caremark.com.  Who is that, I wondered?  Well it seems to be for SilverScript.

So I went through a multi-faceted registration process.  Caremark wanted to text me, but after seeing the long list of things they might text me about I declined that.  I had to confirm my email account with a reasonably sized number that I had to write down (as usual I had not planned for that and had to get up and find a card to write on).  And they automatically selected "paperless," but once again, when I saw the long list of things that somehow I'd have to find out about at the website if at all, I made sure I did NOT select paperless, despite being told how wonderful it would be.

Then finally I got into "my account" at Caremark, and there didn't seem to be anything about billing.  I looked over and over, and finally found something under the "Personal Information" section.  Knowing how important it is to pay these premium bills, I entered my checking account information.  Only after that was confirmed (and thankfully, at least then) it let me know that this was not for premium billing.  For premium billing, I'd have to call some number, which, curiously enough, did not match either of the two numbers on the bill I had received.

By this time, I had finally noticed on the bill, that it said specifically this:

Visit AetnaMedicare.com and click 'Pay Your Premium' or call ...

Which was what I should have done the first time.  So this time I did click on the Pay Your Premium link, and it sent me to, you guessed it, another website!  This time it was InstaMed.com (part of JPMorganChase, it cheerfully told me).  And it let me pay my Silverscript Premium fairly quickly, after entering the PaymentID.  But it was not at all obvious how to set up automatic monthly payments, which was what I wanted to do.  I looked over and over the website.  Finally, on some page where it listed my personal information, payment information, it showed "Automatic Payments - Enabled" and further down on the page, there was a checkmark next to "Automatic Payments."  There wasn't an explanation of this, and I'll have to check in January to be sure the premiums are automatically being paid, but it sort of looks like I have done the right thing.



Tuesday, October 13, 2020

My Social Security Password is Always Expired

I had to navigate another password gamut today, apparently simply because I hadn't visited the Social Security website since January, it had expired my password.  But it didn't tell me that right up front.  So I kept on trying to log in with the password that I had actually written down in a book (I'm getting better at that).  Finally when that didn't work several times I selected the "I don't remember password" as I apparently had no other choice.

So then it had me answer the 3 security questions.  I had actually written the exact answers down in my book also!  However after 3 attempts, it kept telling me I got them wrong (I'm sure I didn't--it was my password which had expired...so it had "expired" everything else also, but it didn't tell me that so I tried 3 times).

I ultimately had to lie and say I couldn't remember my security answers either.  So finally I got a text message with security number to enter, then it emailed me a temporary password.  It could have just started from that point the very first time I entered my "expired" password and saved me a lot of grief.

The first time I entered the temporary password it told me I had entered it wrongly (I'm pretty sure I hadn't) and it then showed "PASSWORD HAS EXPIRED" in large letters, which I thought meant the temporary password.  But finally the temporary password was accepted and I entered a new password.

Through all this, there never seemed to be an option to see what I was entering in the Password box.  There should always be a way to do that IMO.  But I "knew" I was entering the passwords correctly because I was watching my fingers hit the keys, though even then, there is still some uncertainty.




Monday, October 12, 2020

The Mac Finder "Keep Both" dialog

If you select a bunch of files to copy to a different folder, and that folder already has a copy of a file with that same name, the Mac Finder presents a dialog which is nearly but also frustratingly incomplete.  The one possibility that is most likely to be useful is the one possibility that is missing.

The choices presented are:

Keep Both

Stop

Replace

A checkbox also allows you to Apply to All.

Even presuming the name of the file to be the only information that this dialog is based upon (I've talked about that before; ideally the system would compare the content and metadata and let you know if and how they are dissimilar) this is a useless set of choices.  For now I'll assume there is only one file with a particular name.

Generally what you'd want to do when consolidating a set of files would be to skip all the duplicated files, and just copy all the new ones.  Skip is not an option in the Finder dialog.  The Stop option simply drops out of the whole operation.  No further files are copied or even tested.  The Stop option is a panic escape, not something you'd want to rely on for getting work done.  If you knew you were going to be using the Stop option, you wouldn't have bothered to do the operation in the first place.

So in fact you are given no option that would be helpful in consolidating files.  You can perform the Replace option, but that wasteful of system resources including the immediate cost in uselessly replacing one identical file with another, and potentially requiring both copies of an identical file in the backup system.  (I have observed that the Mac's convenient Time Machine will under many circumstances enlarge from multiple copies of the same file.  This seems notably true when the identical files are found on different devices.)  As my stuff has grown, I'm more and more concerned about the size I need for my Backup Device which ultimately becomes the limiting factor when additional harddrives are used.

Now if it was being really nice, the system could actually test the contents of files, and not even bother warning you about identical files (instead just skipping them) and giving you the dialog only when files actually differ, and telling you the size and date information.

Anyway, the lack of basic support for what you'd want to do in maintaining a collection of files fits my conspiracy theory of commercial computer system vendors.  Their aim is not so much to assist in these tasks, but dissuade you from doing them, and instead relying more and more upon online sources of entertainment and edification instead (which will come along with the advertising and mind control, including the mind control to buy more stuff and especially buy more computer stuff).

It may be worth noting that the all the possibly defaults are available in Terminal whose shell was cloned by GNU and inspired by Unix which was designed in the 1970's to actually get stuff done, such as managing a collection of files, and not so much primarily being a vehicle for mind control.